Saturday, February 15, 2020

Bills of Exchange's Rules In Saudi Arabia Essay

Bills of Exchange's Rules In Saudi Arabia - Essay Example The first law is referred to as the Commercial Court Law, which is popularly referred to as Commercial Court Law. The other law is referred to as Commercial Court Law while the other is the Negotiable Instrument Law. It is worth noting that majority of the provision inherent in these regulations are heavily inspired by sharia laws. The commercial law has a defines critical elements that a document must contain in order to qualify as a bill of exchange. According to Article 1 of the commercial paper law, a bill of exchange must have the word bill written on the face value of the document. The other critical element that must be present in the document, according to Commercial Papers Law is an unconditional order that requires payment of a specific amount. Middle East Economic Digest Conferences (2004) says that the document should also contain the name of the drawer and the drawer. More importantly, it is critical that, there is also place and date creating the bill of payment. Finall y, the drawer must also append his/her signature to the bill to make it valid. Article 2 of the Commercial Papers law further reiterates that when any of the elements in Article are missing then the document seizes to be a bill. The Commercial Papers Law is very comprehensive in that it leaves no hitch that fraudster can capitalize on. Fraudsters are very smart, and they are always on the lookout for gaps that they can use to defraud unsuspecting people. Article 5 of the law is very effective in blocking out potential fraudsters from conducting fraud on transactions involving the bill of exchange. This article expressly states that whenever there is a discrepancy between the amount written in words and the amount written in figures, the amount written in word prevails. The justification of such a move is that amounts written in words are not easy to alter as compared to that mount written in word 12 (Middle East Economic Digest Conferences, 2004).  

Sunday, February 2, 2020

Term paper for biomedical ethics PHIL 150 Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

For biomedical ethics PHIL 150 - Term Paper Example In the first part of each article I will be explaining the arguments and the conclusions of their version of Euthanasia. In the second part of this paper I will also look at the philosophical foundation of the Euthanasia from both articles and analyze how the perspectives guide the articles to their conclusions of Euthanasia. With many variations of definitions depending on the legality and morality of a particular region, the simple definition of euthanasia is that it refers to the practice of deliberately terminating a life in order to alleviate pain and suffering (DeGrazia et al 41). This intentional ending of life can be with the consent of the patient or even without the consent of the patient in some cases. The termination of life from the patient will mostly be done by the doctor or a physician. There has always been a rift and arguments on whether euthanasia is morally correct. This has been debated between the moral doctrines by the doctors and also by the philosophers who believe that nobody should have the capability of terminating another person’s life even if the person is ailing and the patient has no chances of getting better, they believe this is ethically wrong (DeGrazia et al 23). Different perspectives have been put forward to argue on the different aspects of euthanasia. Two in stances that come into focus in my case are the arguments by Callahan â€Å"Killing and Allowing to Die† and also an article by Miller et al. â€Å"Regulating Physician-Assisted Death†. In the case of Callahan he argues that there is quite a legitimate dissimilarity between killing and allowing to die. He goes ahead and defends the distinction by analyzing three perspectives overlapping each other in this case; metaphysical, moral and medical perspectives. Under the metaphysical perspectives Callahan explains that the external world is distinct from the self and has its own